a Nikon D40x vakuszinkron ideje lecsökkent a D40-hez képest. A kategóriájában. kiemelkedő 1/500 helyett itt 1/200 mp-et állíthatunk be. Nőtt viszont a fotósorozat. sebessége. A 2,5 kép/mp-es teljesítmény 3 kép/mp-esre hízott, ami nem túl számottevő, de örvendetes tekintve, hogy 6 helyett 10 megapixelről beszélünk.
The Sigma Corporation is pleased to announce the launch of the new 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC for Nikon. This high zoom ration lens, designed exclusively for digital SLR cameras, covers wide angle to telephoto. The built-in motor is capable of autofocusing with all Nikon DSLR cameras.
Nikon's $700 18-200 VRII is probably worse image quality than the combination of the cheap 18-55 kit lens and Nikon's roughly $300 55-200 VR lens. These lenses likewise can't compare image quality wise to using a 20mm prime lens (no zoom), 50mm, 85mm, and 200mm.
1 Couch Apr 9, 2008 #1 Me again. As per 15,000 other threads, I have a Nikon D40 with the 18-55 and 55-200 lens. I've definitely been persuaded by many a very lovely MacRumors chap/chapess
the d40 and d80 are about equal in low-light, with the 40 maybe being a smidgen better. in this case, the VR on the 18-200 would make a difference, since instead of 1/100 with the 18-135, you could shoot at 1/30 with the 18-200 other otherwise equal conditions. so another check in the d40/18-200 column for the OP. btw, high iso is also good for Sigma has announced that it is to make its unstabilized 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC lens compatible with Nikon's D40 and D40x SLRs which lack an in-body focus motor. Previously 'screwdriver' driven, the new lens will sport an integral motor to shift the glass around and will sit aside the 18-200 OS in Sigma's 2008 range. bdv9.